首页 -> 2007年第8期
融合教育中的同伴作用策略
作者：石晓辉
4 Nancy Mamlin. Despite best intentions: when inclusion fails. The Journal of Special Education, 1999, 33 (1): 36-49
5 Summers, A. A., Wolfe, B. L..Do schools make a difference. American Economic Review, 1977, 67: 639-652
6 Alper, S., Ryndak, D.L.. Educating students with severe handicaps in regular classes.The Elementary School Journal, 1992, 92(3): 373-387
7 Brent Hardin, Marie Hardin. Into the mainstream: practical strategies for teaching in inclusive environments. The Clearing House, 2002, (3/4):175-178
8 Gillies, R. M., Ashman, A. F. The effects of cooperative learning on students with learning difficulties in the lower elementry school. Journal of Special Education, 2000, 34: 19-27
9 Tana D'Allura. Enhancing the social interaction skills of preschoolers with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 2002,(8):576-584
10 Mills, P., Cole, K., Jenkins. J.,et al.Effects of differing levels of inclusion on preschoolers with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 1998,65: 79-90
11 Buysse, V., Goldman, B. D., Skinner, M. L.. Setting effects on friendship formation among young children with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 2002,68: 503-517
Peer Interaction Strategies in Inclusive Education
SHI Xiaohui
(Department of Special Education, Nanjing Technical College of Special Education, Nanjing, 210012)
AbstractPeer interaction, an important issue which needs much attention in inclusion, determines the quality of inclusion, reduces teachers' pressure and exploits the potential of Inclusive Education. Peer tutoring, cooperative learning and reverse inclusion are three frequently used peer interaction strategies. The implementation of peer interaction strategies should aim at meeting the special needs of children with disabilities, develop systematic plan and serve to the development of students with and without disabilities.
Key wordspeer interaction peer tutoring cooperative learning reverse inclusion
(责任编校：吴铃)