首页 -> 2008年第1期

儿童性侵害案件中司法访谈的现状及发展趋势

作者:李成齐



  10 Lamb ME,Fauchier A.The effects of question type on self-contradictio ns by chi ldren in the course of forensic interviews.Applied Cognitive Psychology,2001,15( 5):483-491
  11 Saywitz KJ,Goodman GS,Lyon TD.Interviewing children in and out of court:curr e nt research and practice implications.In Myers JEB,Berliner L,Briere J,et al(Eds .).The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (2d Ed).Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage,2002.3 49-377
  12 Davies GM,Westcott HL,Horan N.The impact of questioning style on the content of investigative interviews with suspected child sexual abuse victims.Psychology ,Crime,and Law,2000,6(2):81-97
  13 Lamb ME,Garretson ME.The effects of interviewer gender and child gender on t h e informativeness of alleged child sexual abuse victims in forensic interviews.L aw and Human Behavior,2003,27(2):157-171
  14 Sternberg KJ,Lamb ME,OrbachY,et al.Use of a structured investigative protoco l enhances young children's responses to free-recall prompts in the course of for ensic interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86:997-1005
  15 Hershkowitz I,Orbach Y,LambM,et al.A comparison of mental and physical conte x t reinstatement in forensic interviews with alleged victims of sexual abuse.Appl ied Cognitive Psychology,2002,16(4):429-441
  16 Saywitz KJ,Geiselman RE,Bornstein GK.Effects of cognitive interviewing and p r actice on children's recall performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,1992,77:74 4-756
  17 Hayes BK,Delamothe K.Cognitive interviewing procedures and suggestibility in children's recall.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997,82:562-577
  18 Britton HL,O'Keefe MA.Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse intervi ew.Child Abuse and Neglect,1991,15(4):567-573
  19 Carnes CN.Forensic evaluation of children when sexual abuse is suspected.Hun tsville,AL:National Children's Advocacy Center,2000.1-68
  20 Santtila P,Korkman J, Sandnabba NK. Effects of interview phase, repeated int erviewing, presence of a support person, and anatomically detailed dolls on chil d sexual abuse interviews. Psychology, Crime,and Law,2004,10(1):21-35
  21 Fanetti MN.The assessment of factors which may produce bias in forensic inte rviews of children:a follow-up study utilizing co-occuring biasing factors and a test-retest methodology.PhD.Reno:clinical psychology of University of Nevada,19 99
  22 Haidar BL.Predictors of treatment process and outcome for sexually abused ch ildren.PhD. New Hampshire:clinical psychology of University of Antioch,2005
  23 Cantlon J,Payne G,Erbaugh C.Outcome-based practice: disclosure rates of chil d sexual abuse comparing allegation blind and allegation informed structured inte rviews.Child Abuse and Neglect,1996,20(11):1113-1120
  24 London K, Nunez N.Examining the efficacy of truth/lie discussions in predict i ng and increasing the veracity of children's reports.Journal of Experimental Chi ld Psychology ,2002,83(2):131-147
  25 Talwar V,Lee K,Bala N.Children's conceptual knowledge of lying and its relat i on to their actual behaviors: implications for court competence examines.Law and Human Behavior,2002,26(4):395-415
  

[1] [2] [3] [5]